Skip to content

What is a citizens' assembly

A citizens’ assembly is a group of ordinary people, chosen by lot to mirror the wider population, who come together to learn about an issue, deliberate, and make recommendations. It’s the format behind most of the deliberations in our Run Reports — from the Irish assembly on the Eighth Amendment to the French convention on end of life.

  • Selection by lot, stratified. Members are picked at random, but with quotas — typically gender, age, education, socioeconomic background, and geography — so the assembly is a fair cross-section of the public (a “mini-public”). That cross-sectional quality is what gives it legitimacy: it looks and thinks like everyone else. Choosing which categories to balance is itself a judgement — the French end-of-life convention, for instance, debated whether to include religion and decided against it.
  • Learn, then deliberate. Members hear balanced expert evidence and a range of viewpoints, then deliberate in small facilitated groups over multiple sessions — often several weekends or longer.
  • Experts inform; citizens decide. A governance or steering committee usually sets up the process (duration, criteria, who’s invited). In the strongest designs, once it’s running the experts step back and the citizens make the calls.
  • Recommend. The assembly produces recommendations — to a government, a parliament, or a referendum.

Because members aren’t defending fixed party positions, assemblies tend to treat hard questions as shared problems, which often lets them reach considered, broadly-supported conclusions on issues that paralyse ordinary politics. Their weakness is usually the last mile: most are advisory, so their recommendations can be filtered, diluted, or ignored by the institutions meant to act on them — which is why some, like the Ostbelgien model, are being made permanent and given real standing.