Skip to content

Austria's Citizens' Climate Assembly (2022)

TL;DR. Over six weekends in the first half of 2022, 84 randomly-selected Austrians sat down as the Klimarat der Bürgerinnen und Bürger — the Citizens’ Climate Assembly — to work out how Austria could become climate-neutral. They produced 93 recommendations, and, unusually, the government published a detailed response to each one.

WhenJanuary–June 2022, over six weekends
WhereAustria (national)
Who84 citizens, selected by sortition to mirror the country across region and social background
TopicHow Austria can reach climate neutrality
OutcomeA final report (July 2022) with 93 recommendations, followed by a point-by-point government response

The Klimarat was convened against a strong policy backdrop — Austria has a legislated climate-neutrality target — and was given the scientific support of a dedicated expert panel so that deliberation rested on a shared evidence base. The 84 members met across six weekends of learning and deliberation, covering consumption, mobility, energy, housing, and food, before voting their recommendations into a final report in July 2022.

What sets the Austrian case apart in the run-report library is the follow-up. Rather than letting the recommendations “die in committee,” the responsible ministry published a written response addressing each of the 93 recommendations — explaining where proposals were already coherent with policy, where they fed into legislation, and where they would not be taken forward and why. That kind of structured, on-the-record reply is exactly the minimum that turns an advisory assembly into something more than tokenism — a duty the assembly field increasingly treats as essential.

The Klimarat sits in the wider European “deliberative wave” of national climate assemblies alongside France, the UK, and others, and is documented through the KNOCA network’s learning calls so that organisers elsewhere can borrow what worked. Its lasting contribution to practice is less a single headline recommendation than a demonstration that the response phase — closing the loop back to the citizens who did the work — can be done properly. See institutionalising deliberation for why that loop is what makes assemblies stick.