Skip to content
Citizen Infrastructure

The organizer kit

Most of citizen infrastructure is built for institutions — cities, agencies, large organisations running formal participation processes. But a lot of the actual change happens somewhere much smaller: a neighbour who wants to fix something in their town, organising from a WhatsApp group and running the whole thing off their phone.

Matt Stempeck calls the unsolved challenge here the “organizer kit” — and it’s one of the clearest gaps in the field.

Who it’s for

Section titled “Who it’s for”

These are people who:

  • come to civic-tech folks already hungry to act — looking for a tool, already talking to neighbours, already organising;
  • are under-resourced — they might not have the formal background to know what a “CRM” is, but they’re doing the real work of moving people;
  • are disconnected from the national and global civic-tech conversation, even though they’re the ones actually using the platforms everyone else is busy building.

As Stempeck puts it: the field spends its time aggregating directories and building platforms — “but they’re the ones actually using those platforms in a political context to do something.”

The idea

Section titled “The idea”

What’s the version zero of a starter kit you could hand someone like that — something that supercharges what they’re already doing, instead of asking them to abandon their WhatsApp group and adopt a whole new system? And just as important: what training and support wraps around it, so the kit is a hand on the shoulder, not a tool dropped on a doorstep?

Stempeck and Liz Barry (Metagov) sketched a pitch for exactly this, though funding for it has been hard to come by. It remains, in his words, an unsolved challenge: how to support people locally, in a way that works with how they already work, while bringing in some of the benefits of digital technology.

Why it matters here

Section titled “Why it matters here”

This is close to the heart of what “citizen infrastructure” should mean. The point isn’t the cleverest platform; it’s whether the person on the ground — the one connecting with neighbours and coordinating a community — has what they need. It’s the same lesson as why civic tech projects fail: meet people where they already are, and build for what they actually do.

Sources

Section titled “Sources”