Skip to content
Citizen Infrastructure

Los Angeles City Charter Civic Assembly (2026)

TL;DR. Over four days in early 2026, a randomly-selected, demographically representative panel of Los Angeles residents took on a single question put to them by the city’s Charter Reform Commission: what should be the size and structure of the City Council? Their answer — backed by 89% of delegates — was to expand the Council from 15 to 25 single-member districts that grow automatically with the population, and, going beyond the brief, to establish a permanent civic assembly to keep watch on the Council. The recommendations now feed the Commission’s proposals for the November 2026 ballot.

At a glance

Section titled “At a glance”
WhenFeb 28 – March 8, 2026 (four days; ~26 hours of deliberation)
WhereLos Angeles, California
Who35 voting delegates, randomly selected by civic lottery from respondents to a postcard mailed to 20,000 addresses across all Council districts (plus outreach to unhoused residents), stratified to mirror the city
Charge”What should be the size and structure of the Los Angeles City Council?”
OrganisersRewrite LA coalition (Public Democracy LA, Metagov, Healthy Democracy, Sortition USA, and others); selection and deliberation designed and run by Healthy Democracy
RecipientLA Charter Reform Commission → City Council → November 2026 ballot
Outcome9 recommendations, supported by 31 of 35 delegates (89%)

What happened

Section titled “What happened”

The Los Angeles City Charter — the city’s constitution, drafted in 1924 and not substantially changed since 1999 — came under review by a Charter Reform Commission in 2025. Rather than rely on sparsely-attended hearings with one-minute public comments, the Commission signed a Letter of Commitment (October 30, 2025) asking the Rewrite LA coalition to convene a civic assembly of everyday Angelenos, and pledged to consider its recommendations.

Delegates were chosen by civic lottery: a postcard went to 20,000 residential addresses spread evenly across the city’s Council districts — with extra outreach, via social-service organisations, to residents without a fixed address — and a representative panel was drawn at random from respondents to mirror the city by age, gender, race/ethnicity, neighbourhood, party, housing status, and education. Over four days (Feb 28–Mar 1 and Mar 7–8) the assembly heard from 17 expert presenters, surfaced 68 initial policy concepts, and refined them through small- and large-group deliberation into a final slate.

The headline answer to the council-size question: 25 single-member districts, with the number set to rise automatically with the census so that no district exceeds 170,000 residents, and a Council presidency that rotates at random among members. But the delegates went further than the brief. Their first and most striking recommendation was to establish a permanent, randomly-selected civic assembly — meeting at least twice a year — with standing power to review, advise on, and refer Council decisions. The rest tightened the city’s integrity machinery: ranked-choice voting; an independent, nonpartisan Inspector General to lead the Ethics Commission; removing Council and mayoral appointment power over that Commission; a one-year district-residency requirement; and hiring a professional COO and CFO independent of the mayor and Council.

The Final Report — by design composed entirely of the delegates’ own words — went to the Charter Reform Commission, which folded it into the proposals it submitted to the City Council in April 2026. The Council decides in July 2026 which reforms reach the November 2026 ballot, where Angelenos themselves have the final say.

Why it matters

Section titled “Why it matters”

This is one of the first big-city citizens’ assemblies in the United States wired directly into a binding constitutional process — its output is on a path to a real ballot, not an advisory shelf. Two things stand out. First, asked a narrow question, the assembly chose to answer a structural one: its top recommendation was to institutionalise deliberation itself — a standing citizens’ assembly to watch the Council, which is the hard part of democratic innovation. Second, it was built and run by a coalition rather than a government: Rewrite LA pairs sortition (via Healthy Democracy and Sortition USA) with public-input technology and cultural storytelling — a model for how civic infrastructure can be assembled around, and handed to, a city.

Sources

Section titled “Sources”